Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Current Trends
in
ACL Management
  • Lesley Hall MSc. MCSP
  • Droitwich Knee Clinic &
  • The Knee Foundation
2
Injury Prevention
  • ACL injuries in female Athletes (Hewett et al 2006)
  • (meta-analysis)


  • ‘all 3 studies that incorporated high-intensity plyometrics reduced ACL risk, whereas the studies that did not incorporate high-intensity plyometrics did not reduce ACL risk’
3
Injury Prevention
  • Female athletes have 4-6 fold ↑ risk of ACL injury compared with male counterparts.


  • Plyometric training (high intensity)
  • Biomechanics analysis and feedback (eg. Leg alignment)
  • Technique training (eg.jump landing)
  • Strength training
  • Balance & core stability training
  • Hewett,t. et al (2006)
  • ACL injuries in female athletes – part 2, a meta-analysis of neuromuscular interventions aimed at injury prevention


4
PEP programme



Santa Monica Orthopaedic & Sports Medicine Group

www.aclprevent.com
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
Incidence of Re-injury
  • <18          -      25%
  • 18 - 25     -      10%
  • >25          -      5%


  • Arthrofibrosis
  • early 1980’s         -       19%
  • >1996                  -       1%


  • Shelbourne
9
Mechanism of ACL injury
  • Non-contact injury at contact sports (72%)
  • Sudden deceleration followed by change of direction or landing motion (often valgus)
  • Majority with foot-strike near full extension
  • Quads implicated (with lax hams) in straining ACL with max eccentric contraction
  • Boden et al, 2000.


10
Clinical Examination:
11
Lachman’s test
  • Very sensitive and specific for ACL
  • Malanga GA, Andrus S, Nadler SF, McLean J. Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med & Rehab 2003; 84(4):592-603.
  • Low correlation with subjective instability


12
Feagin’s test

Feagin JA, Cooke TD. Prone examination for ACL insufficiency. JBJS 1989; 71-B:863
13
Lateral Pivot Shift
  • Principle: Easy anterior subluxation of lateral femoral condyle
  • Components:
    • Full (hyper) extension
    • Patient relaxed
    • Lift foot and suspend knee
    • Simultaneous valgus and internal rotation
    • LTC now subluxed (you can’t see this yet)
    • Flexion, keeping valg/IR stress: LTC reduces with a palpable / visible clunk / shift/ glide

14
The lateral pivot shift sign
  • Malanga GA, Andrus S, Nadler SF, McLean J. Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med & Rehab 2003; 84(4):592-603.
15
Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises
  • Strain on the ACL:
  • CKC exercises do NOT shield the ACL totally from strain – peak strain on the ACL during OKC active extension and bilateral squatting are equal  (Beynnon et al 1997)
  • However
  • á resistance in OKC ex’s increases ACL strain
  • á load in CKC ex’s does NOT increase ACL strain.
  • (Fleming et al 2003)
16
Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises

  • Step ups


  • Step downs


  • Lunge


  • Unilateral sit to stand


  • (Heijne et al 2004)


17
"Open Kinetic Chain Exercises"
  • Open Kinetic Chain Exercises


  • It is only OKC quadriceps exercises which compromise the ACL
  • &
  • then only in 0-50° range
18
 
19
"Peak ACL strain occurs when..."
  • Peak ACL strain occurs when the knee is flexed at smaller angles - ie. 20-30°
  • á knee flexion angle â ACL strain - ? Due to increased hamstring activity with greater hip flexion


  • “At this time it is not possible to identify which exercises are safe or harmful to a healing graft because strain thresholds that are beneficial and/or detrimental to graft healing remain unknown”
  • (Heijne et al 2004)
20
Treatment
  • ­ ROM = to other side (ext & flexion).
  • Facilitate hamstring function.
  • (Positive pivot shift - add resisted ext tibial rotation with knee flexion - esp eccentric.)
  • Progressive strengthening:                                          PNF/NWB ex’s
  •   Bilat WB ex’s
  •   Unilat WB ex’s
  •   Unidirectional
  •   Multidirectional


21
 
22
Include:
  • Balance
  • Proprioception
  • Endurance
  • Agility
  • Sport/occupation specific activities
23
Potential problems in the ACL deficient knee
  • Recurrent meniscal tears
  • Advanced joint surface erosion
  • Progressively increasing laxity
  • Chronic synovitis


  • Improper rehabilitation can elicit or
  • accelerate these symptoms
24
Indications for Surgery
  • Instability


  • Activity level


  • Age ?????????


25
Timing of surgery:
What is urgent?
  • Ligament repair – urgent (within a few days)
  • Ligament reconstruction - not urgent
  •                  Optimum time 4 weeks
  • Meniscus: Partial menisectomy: non-urgent
  •   Meniscal repair: better early
  •   Bucket handle tear with locked knee:   urgent
  • Knee dislocation: urgent hospitalisation -  
      Check for vascular damage
26
Patellar tendon graft
  • Advantages
  • Disadvantages
  • Indications
27
Quads tendon graft
  • Advantages
  • Disadvantages
  • Indications
28
Hamstring tendon graft
  • Advantages
  • Disadvantages
  • Indications


29
Double BundleTechnique

  • Postero-lateral bundle - controls rotational stability


  • Antero-medial bundle - controls A/P stability
30
Allograft
31
Healing / Ligamentisation
  • Graft necrosis


  • Revascularisation


  • Cellular population


  • Collagen deposition


  • Maturation
32
Vascular Response
  • Autografts:
  • 6 wks – graft shows avascular necrosis surrounded by a vascular synovial sheath
  • 8-10 wks – graft invaded by budding capillaries
  • 16 wks – near complete revascularisation
  • 20wks - revascularised
33
"Graft plays innocent role in..."
  • Graft plays innocent role in the race between avascular necrosis & revascularisation


  • Revascularisation takes place from the ends of the graft towards the middle


  • Nutrition to the graft is by diffusion from synovial fluid


  • The tibial remnant of the ACL & the fat pad are important structures for synovialisation & vascularisation & ? feedback mechanism.
34
ACL graft at 3 months post-op
35
Tensile Strength
  • Autografts are strongest at the time of transplantation


  • Tensile strength ↓ during first 12 weeks


  • Strength then ↑ over next 9 – 12 months
36
Fixation
  • PTG: bone on bone healing – secure by 6-8        weeks


  • Hamstring graft: soft tissue/bone healing –
  •    8-12 weeks


  • Rodeo, Scott et al (1991)
  • Scranton, Pierce et al (1998)


37
"Four Phases"
  • Four Phases
  • Of
  • Rehabilitation



  • Shelbourne et al.(1992)
38
"Phase 1 – Pre-operative Phase"

    • Phase 1 – Pre-operative Phase


    • Focuses on:


      • Resolving swelling
      • Regaining maximum range of movement
      • Initiating a strengthening programme
      • Mental preparation by the patient
39
"Goal of Phase 1"
  • Goal of Phase 1



  • To prepare the patient for surgery with a full understanding of the operative and
  • post-operative procedures.
40
"Phase 2 – Initial Post-operative..."
    • Phase 2 – Initial Post-operative Phase


    • Focuses on
      • regaining active and passive knee movement
        •        full extension (hyperextension)
        •        flexion to 90 degrees
      • wound healing
      • maintenance of active quadriceps control
      • early functional weight bearing
      • closed kinetic chain activity
41
"Mobilisation"
  • Mobilisation


  • Early range of motion exercises will prevent adhesion formation and tightening of soft tissues around the joint, thereby restricting the development of contractures or excessive scar tissue
42
 
43
"Loss of full extension increases..."
  • Loss of full extension increases patello-femoral contact forces and contributes to quadriceps weakness (Sachs et al)


  • Aims:
  • Flexion     = to opposite side
  • Extension = to opposite side
44
"Phase 3 – Progressive Rehabilitation"
    • Phase 3 – Progressive Rehabilitation


    • Focuses on
      • restoration of improved motor function
      • restoring a normal gait pattern
      • increasing flexion to 135 degrees
      • improve muscle timing, coordination and strength training
      • progress functional activity
45
"Phase 4 – Fully Integrated..."
    • Phase 4 – Fully Integrated Function



    • Focuses on
      • restoration of full function
      • sport/ work specific training
      • return to sport/work on reaching 70% of the strength of the unaffected leg




      • Monitor all stages, progression is dependent     on swelling and range of motion


46
Integrated rehabilitation
(functional testing algorithm)
  • Davies’ sequential testing series:
  • Basic measurements – VAS for pain
  • AROM; PROM (<10% diff)


  • KT2000 (<3mm diff – normal, if >3mm – guarded progression)


  • Proprioception / balance tests (<10%→progress)


  • Closed chain testing – linea bilat isokinetic (<30% diff →progress)


47
"Open chain testing - isokinetic"
  • Open chain testing - isokinetic


  • Why test?
  • ‘ If a muscle cannot function in an isolated muscle test then it cannot function in an integrated kinematic movement’
  • When safe to test?
  • BPTB - >6wks FSHG – 8-12wks
  • (if slightly lax consider ROM)


  • Progress if <25% diff.


48
"Functional tests:"
  • Functional tests:


  • Bilat squat – even weight (b’room scales)
  • Functional jump tests-bilat - single jump for distance. (males100% height; females 90% height)
  • Functional hop tests – uninv leg then inv leg
  • Lower extremity function test
  • Sports specific tests
  • NB look at quality of movement in each test, not just distance – good control is imperative
49
Donald Shelbourne
Current  Ideas (2003)
  • Primary aim is to regain limb symmetry


  • Avoid haemarthrosis & gross effusion – bed rest X 1 week, CPM & cryocuff


  • Use of contra-lateral graft to avoid clash of treatment principles in the early stages


  • Mechanism of injury
50
"Mastrokalos et al,"
  • Mastrokalos et al, May 2005


  • “ The contra-lateral bone-patellar tendon graft appears to present no advantage over the ipsilateral graft, as all symptoms concerning donor site morbidity are shifted from the injured into the healthy knee, and return to activity is not more rapid”
51
Comparison of PTG & Hamstring Grafts
  • These authors all found results comparable:


  • Maeda et al  1996
  • Siegal & Barber-Westin  1998
  • Corry et al  1999
  • Eriksson et al  2000
  • Aune et al  2001
  • Beard et al  2001
  • Goradia & Grana  2001
52
Increased Laxity in FSHG subjects
  • Aglietti et al  1994
  • Barrett et al  2002
  • Beynnon et al  2002



  • NO increase in laxity:
  • Cooley et al   2001
  • Corry et al  1999
53
More restricted rehabilitation for FSHG
  • Siegal & Barber-Westin  1998
  • Fu et al  2000
  • Barrett et al  2002



  • Restriction not required:
  • Howell &Taylor  1996
  • Corry et al  1999


54
Females & the FSHG
  • Barrett et al  2002:
  • PTG – 8% failure rate
  • FSHG - 23% failure rate



  • Corry et al  1999
  • Noojin et al 2000
55
Tibial Tunnel Widening
  • Occurs in FSHG > PTG subjects
  • á with accelerated rehabilitation
  • 75% widening occurs in first 3 months
  • (Hantes et al 2004)


  • 50% occurs in first 6 weeks, before biological graft incorporation (Fink et al 2001)


  • Expansion occurs over time – 1-12 weeks, not immediately after surgery (Buck et al 2004)
56
Reading the Literature

  • Outcome measures:


  • Stability – KT2000; Lachman
  • Function
  • Patient Satisfaction
57
"Laxity tests:"
  • Laxity tests:


  • Commonly used to measure success of reconstructive surgery


  • NO correlation between laxity test results and any function test or patient satisfaction results


  • (Harter et al, 1988; Lavoie et al, 2001; Kocher et al, 2002)
58
 
59
"Functional Performance Tests:"
  • Functional Performance Tests:


  • Lephart et al (1991)
  • Co-contraction test – timed side-stepping using rubber cord
  • Carioca test – timed
  • Shuttle runs – timed


  • ? What is target / normal for each subject
  • ? Useful for monitoring progress


60
"Single leg hop tests:"
  • Single leg hop tests:
  • >15% limb difference is classed as abnormal (Barber et al 1992)


  • Timed 6 metre hop (Barber et al 1990)
  • Single hop for distance
  • Triple hop for distance
  • Cross-over hop for distance (Noyes et al 1991)
  • Stair hop
  • Vertical hop (Hopper et al 2002)
  • Adapted cross-over hop test (Clarke et al 2002)


61
"Hop test asymmetry correlates with..."
  • Hop test asymmetry correlates with low velocity isokinetic results (Noyes 1991; Jarvela 2001)


  • Test – retest reliability in ACL reconstruction subjects at 1yr post-op (Hopper et al 2002)


  • Eastlack et al (1998) compared copers and non-copers following ACL injury & found the cross-over hop test to be the most discriminatory (lateral movements)
62
Adapted cross-over hop test
(Clark et al, 2002)
63
"Scoring systems:"
  • Scoring systems:


  • Lysholm knee scoring scale: specific to activities of daily living & symptoms. Scores out of 100


  • Tegner activity scale: work / sport related activities. Scores 1-10


  • IKDC subjective evaluation form:  Complicated scoring system
  • (David Johnson & Roger Smith, 2001)