|
1
|
- Lesley Hall MSc. MCSP
- Droitwich Knee Clinic &
- The Knee Foundation
|
|
2
|
- ACL injuries in female Athletes (Hewett et al 2006)
- (meta-analysis)
- ‘all 3 studies that incorporated high-intensity plyometrics reduced ACL
risk, whereas the studies that did not incorporate high-intensity
plyometrics did not reduce ACL risk’
|
|
3
|
- Female athletes have 4-6 fold ↑ risk of ACL injury compared with
male counterparts.
- Plyometric training (high intensity)
- Biomechanics analysis and feedback (eg. Leg alignment)
- Technique training (eg.jump landing)
- Strength training
- Balance & core stability training
- Hewett,t. et al (2006)
- ACL injuries in female athletes – part 2, a meta-analysis of
neuromuscular interventions aimed at injury prevention
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- <18 - 25%
- 18 - 25 - 10%
- >25 - 5%
- Arthrofibrosis
- early 1980’s - 19%
- >1996 - 1%
- Shelbourne
|
|
9
|
- Non-contact injury at contact sports (72%)
- Sudden deceleration followed by change of direction or landing motion
(often valgus)
- Majority with foot-strike near full extension
- Quads implicated (with lax hams) in straining ACL with max eccentric
contraction
- Boden et al, 2000.
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Very sensitive and specific for ACL
- Malanga GA, Andrus S, Nadler SF, McLean J. Physical examination of the
knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity
of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med & Rehab 2003;
84(4):592-603.
- Low correlation with subjective instability
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Principle: Easy anterior subluxation of lateral femoral condyle
- Components:
- Full (hyper) extension
- Patient relaxed
- Lift foot and suspend knee
- Simultaneous valgus and internal rotation
- LTC now subluxed (you can’t see this yet)
- Flexion, keeping valg/IR stress: LTC reduces with a palpable / visible
clunk / shift/ glide
|
|
14
|
- Malanga GA, Andrus S, Nadler SF, McLean J. Physical examination of the
knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity
of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med & Rehab 2003;
84(4):592-603.
|
|
15
|
- Strain on the ACL:
- CKC exercises do NOT shield the ACL totally from strain – peak strain on
the ACL during OKC active extension and bilateral squatting are
equal (Beynnon et al 1997)
- However
- á resistance in OKC ex’s
increases ACL strain
- á load in CKC ex’s does NOT
increase ACL strain.
- (Fleming et al 2003)
|
|
16
|
- Step ups
- Step downs
- Lunge
- Unilateral sit to stand
- (Heijne et al 2004)
|
|
17
|
- Open Kinetic Chain Exercises
- It is only OKC quadriceps exercises which compromise the ACL
- &
- then only in 0-50° range
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- Peak ACL strain occurs when the knee is flexed at smaller angles - ie.
20-30°
- á knee flexion angle â ACL strain - ? Due to increased
hamstring activity with greater hip flexion
- “At this time it is not possible to identify which exercises are safe or
harmful to a healing graft because strain thresholds that are beneficial
and/or detrimental to graft healing remain unknown”
- (Heijne et al 2004)
|
|
20
|
- ROM = to other side (ext
& flexion).
- Facilitate hamstring function.
- (Positive pivot shift - add resisted ext tibial rotation with knee
flexion - esp eccentric.)
- Progressive strengthening:
PNF/NWB ex’s
- Bilat WB ex’s
- Unilat WB ex’s
- Unidirectional
- Multidirectional
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Balance
- Proprioception
- Endurance
- Agility
- Sport/occupation specific activities
|
|
23
|
- Recurrent meniscal tears
- Advanced joint surface erosion
- Progressively increasing laxity
- Chronic synovitis
- Improper rehabilitation can elicit or
- accelerate these symptoms
|
|
24
|
- Instability
- Activity level
- Age ?????????
|
|
25
|
- Ligament repair – urgent (within a few days)
- Ligament reconstruction - not urgent
- Optimum time 4
weeks
- Meniscus: Partial menisectomy: non-urgent
- Meniscal repair: better early
- Bucket handle tear with
locked knee: urgent
- Knee dislocation: urgent hospitalisation -
Check for vascular
damage
|
|
26
|
- Advantages
- Disadvantages
- Indications
|
|
27
|
- Advantages
- Disadvantages
- Indications
|
|
28
|
- Advantages
- Disadvantages
- Indications
|
|
29
|
- Postero-lateral bundle - controls rotational stability
- Antero-medial bundle - controls A/P stability
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
- Graft necrosis
- Revascularisation
- Cellular population
- Collagen deposition
- Maturation
|
|
32
|
- Autografts:
- 6 wks – graft shows avascular necrosis surrounded by a vascular synovial
sheath
- 8-10 wks – graft invaded by budding capillaries
- 16 wks – near complete revascularisation
- 20wks - revascularised
|
|
33
|
- Graft plays innocent role in the race between avascular necrosis &
revascularisation
- Revascularisation takes place from the ends of the graft towards the
middle
- Nutrition to the graft is by diffusion from synovial fluid
- The tibial remnant of the ACL & the fat pad are important structures
for synovialisation & vascularisation & ? feedback mechanism.
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
- Autografts are strongest at the time of transplantation
- Tensile strength ↓ during first 12 weeks
- Strength then ↑ over next 9 – 12 months
|
|
36
|
- PTG: bone on bone healing – secure by 6-8
weeks
- Hamstring graft: soft tissue/bone healing –
- 8-12 weeks
- Rodeo, Scott et al (1991)
- Scranton, Pierce et al (1998)
|
|
37
|
- Four Phases
- Of
- Rehabilitation
- Shelbourne et al.(1992)
|
|
38
|
- Phase 1 – Pre-operative Phase
- Focuses on:
- Resolving swelling
- Regaining maximum range of movement
- Initiating a strengthening programme
- Mental preparation by the patient
|
|
39
|
- Goal of Phase 1
- To prepare the patient for surgery with a full understanding of the
operative and
- post-operative procedures.
|
|
40
|
- Phase 2 – Initial Post-operative Phase
- Focuses on
- regaining active and passive knee movement
- full extension
(hyperextension)
- flexion to 90 degrees
- wound healing
- maintenance of active quadriceps control
- early functional weight bearing
- closed kinetic chain activity
|
|
41
|
- Mobilisation
- Early range of motion exercises will prevent adhesion formation and
tightening of soft tissues around the joint, thereby restricting the
development of contractures or excessive scar tissue
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
- Loss of full extension increases patello-femoral contact forces and
contributes to quadriceps weakness (Sachs et al)
- Aims:
- Flexion = to opposite side
- Extension = to opposite side
|
|
44
|
- Phase 3 – Progressive Rehabilitation
- Focuses on
- restoration of improved motor function
- restoring a normal gait pattern
- increasing flexion to 135 degrees
- improve muscle timing, coordination and strength training
- progress functional activity
|
|
45
|
- Phase 4 – Fully Integrated Function
- Focuses on
- restoration of full function
- sport/ work specific training
- return to sport/work on reaching 70% of the strength of the unaffected
leg
- Monitor all stages, progression is dependent on swelling and range of motion
|
|
46
|
- Davies’ sequential testing series:
- Basic measurements – VAS for pain
- AROM; PROM (<10% diff)
- KT2000 (<3mm diff – normal, if >3mm – guarded progression)
- Proprioception / balance tests (<10%→progress)
- Closed chain testing – linea bilat isokinetic (<30% diff →progress)
|
|
47
|
- Open chain testing - isokinetic
- Why test?
- ‘ If a muscle cannot function in an isolated muscle test then it cannot
function in an integrated kinematic movement’
- When safe to test?
- BPTB - >6wks FSHG – 8-12wks
- (if slightly lax consider ROM)
- Progress if <25% diff.
|
|
48
|
- Functional tests:
- Bilat squat – even weight (b’room scales)
- Functional jump tests-bilat - single jump for distance. (males100%
height; females 90% height)
- Functional hop tests – uninv leg then inv leg
- Lower extremity function test
- Sports specific tests
- NB look at quality of movement in each test, not just distance – good
control is imperative
|
|
49
|
- Primary aim is to regain limb symmetry
- Avoid haemarthrosis & gross effusion – bed rest X 1 week, CPM &
cryocuff
- Use of contra-lateral graft to avoid clash of treatment principles in
the early stages
- Mechanism of injury
|
|
50
|
- Mastrokalos et al, May 2005
- “ The contra-lateral bone-patellar tendon graft appears to present no
advantage over the ipsilateral graft, as all symptoms concerning donor
site morbidity are shifted from the injured into the healthy knee, and
return to activity is not more rapid”
|
|
51
|
- These authors all found results comparable:
- Maeda et al 1996
- Siegal & Barber-Westin 1998
- Corry et al 1999
- Eriksson et al 2000
- Aune et al 2001
- Beard et al 2001
- Goradia & Grana 2001
|
|
52
|
- Aglietti et al 1994
- Barrett et al 2002
- Beynnon et al 2002
- NO increase in laxity:
- Cooley et al 2001
- Corry et al 1999
|
|
53
|
- Siegal & Barber-Westin 1998
- Fu et al 2000
- Barrett et al 2002
- Restriction not required:
- Howell &Taylor 1996
- Corry et al 1999
|
|
54
|
- Barrett et al 2002:
- PTG – 8% failure rate
- FSHG - 23% failure rate
- Corry et al 1999
- Noojin et al 2000
|
|
55
|
- Occurs in FSHG > PTG subjects
- á with accelerated
rehabilitation
- 75% widening occurs in first 3 months
- (Hantes et al 2004)
- 50% occurs in first 6 weeks, before biological graft incorporation (Fink
et al 2001)
- Expansion occurs over time – 1-12 weeks, not immediately after surgery (Buck
et al 2004)
|
|
56
|
- Outcome measures:
- Stability – KT2000; Lachman
- Function
- Patient Satisfaction
|
|
57
|
- Laxity tests:
- Commonly used to measure success of reconstructive surgery
- NO correlation between laxity test results and any function test or
patient satisfaction results
- (Harter et al, 1988; Lavoie et al, 2001; Kocher et al, 2002)
|
|
58
|
|
|
59
|
- Functional Performance Tests:
- Lephart et al (1991)
- Co-contraction test – timed side-stepping using rubber cord
- Carioca test – timed
- Shuttle runs – timed
- ? What is target / normal for each subject
- ? Useful for monitoring progress
|
|
60
|
- Single leg hop tests:
- >15% limb difference is classed as abnormal (Barber et al 1992)
- Timed 6 metre hop (Barber et al 1990)
- Single hop for distance
- Triple hop for distance
- Cross-over hop for distance (Noyes et al 1991)
- Stair hop
- Vertical hop (Hopper et al 2002)
- Adapted cross-over hop test (Clarke et al 2002)
|
|
61
|
- Hop test asymmetry correlates with low velocity isokinetic results
(Noyes 1991; Jarvela 2001)
- Test – retest reliability in ACL reconstruction subjects at 1yr post-op
(Hopper et al 2002)
- Eastlack et al (1998) compared copers and non-copers following ACL
injury & found the cross-over hop test to be the most discriminatory
(lateral movements)
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
- Scoring systems:
- Lysholm knee scoring scale: specific to activities of daily living &
symptoms. Scores out of 100
- Tegner activity scale: work / sport related activities. Scores 1-10
- IKDC subjective evaluation form:
Complicated scoring system
- (David Johnson & Roger Smith, 2001)
|